![]() They claim the prosecution did this intentionally, which prosecutors deny. 13, 2021, and only upon a specific request – two days before closing arguments and after the evidence had been closed,” the defense motion said. The state “did not provide their quality video to the defense until Nov. He ultimately decided to do so, but raised concerns about the blurriness of the photos taken from the video. The defense motion claims that, during jury instructions, the state came up with a much clearer video to show the judge, who was considering whether to include the state’s provocation argument in jury instructions. The defense denies that he pointed the gun and says the prosecution video and screenshots from it are too blurry to tell. The state is trying to use the drone video to convince jurors that Rittenhouse provoked Joseph Rosenbaum to chase him by pointing a gun at another man, Joseph Ziminski, which would make it tougher for him to prove self-defense under Wisconsin law. The motion was filed by lawyers Mark Richards and Corey Chirafisi, who are the lawyers for Rittenhouse. They say the dimensions on the defense video are 480 X 212 the prosecution’s is 1920 X 844. What that means is the video provided to the defense was not as clear as the video kept by the state. “The problem is, the prosecution gave the defense a compressed version of the video. 25, 2020,” the defense attorneys wrote in their motion. On day 5 of the trial, the prosecution “turned over to the defense footage of a drone video which captured some of the incident from Aug. The defense claimed in a motion that the video “wasn’t provided to the defense until after the trial concluded” by the state. □BREAKING NEW MOTION: Kenosha prosecutors WITHELD VIDEO EVIDENCE from Kyle Rittenhouse Defense Team /pqk86hhqqu The Defense Claims the Prosecution Gave Them a Smaller, Compressed Video Multi-Platform (Windows, Mac and Linux).” “HandBrake is a tool for converting video from nearly any format to a selection of modern, widely supported codecs. “They could have asked for a thumb drive, they could have asked for whatever,” Assistant District Attorney James Kraus said, according to Fox. Is that editing? Simply having a program doesn’t mean he knows how to use it or used it nefariously.”Īccording to Fox News, the prosecution said they didn’t intend to give the defense the compressed video but it accidentally occurred when they moved it from an iPhone to an Android. However, handbrake quickly became a Twitter trend.Īs one Twitter user noted, “Handbrake can be used to simply save a file as a new format. It’s possible he has the software for other purpose. ![]() ![]() Internet sleuths are connecting dots in a way that is not proven. Lunchbox and Flufferboy wouldn’t do anything dishonest, would they? #RittenhouseTrial #handbrake /ha8oPnOdhUĭoes the handbrake controversy prove Kraus or lead prosecutor Thomas Binger compressed the video using it? No. The defense alleges that prosecutors gave them a worse quality drone video than they used this is important because the state is basing a key argument on the video. A key part of that motion deals with a late-produced drone video that shows the first shooting scene. The video’s size is an issue because the defense filed a motion asking Judge Bruce Schroeder to grant a mistrial with prejudice. There is a dispute over a drone video that is key to the case the defense claims the prosecutors, including Kraus, gave them a compressed, smaller, and worse quality video than prosecutors used. ![]() HandBrake relates to video compression software that Internet sleuths claim they spotted on the laptop of Rittenhouse prosecutor Jim Kraus. Kyle Rittenhouse was found not guilty by a Kenosha jury of all charges on November 19, 2021. What is the significance of “handbrake” in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial in Wisconsin? ![]() Handbrake software is a claim in the Rittenhouse trial. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |